Saraki's appeal to Supreme Court was as a result of the Court of Appeal's dismissal of his objection to the trial by the Code Conduct Tribunal on the charges against him by the Code of Conduct Bureau over allegations of false assets declaration and corruption
Last week, the Appeal Court in Abuja dismissed Mr. Saraki’s objection to the trial, affirming the powers of the tribunal to hear a 13-count charge of alleged falsification of his assets declaration and corruption brought by the Code of Conduct Bureau against the senate president.
Last week, the Appeal Court in Abuja dismissed Mr. Saraki’s objection to the trial, affirming the powers of the tribunal to hear a 13-count charge of alleged falsification of his assets declaration and corruption brought by the Code of Conduct Bureau against the senate president.
However, Saraki's lead counsel, Joseph Daudu, said the aim of the appeal before the Supreme Court of Nigeria was to set aside the decision of the court of appeal, regarding the composition of tribunal.
According to him, “we think that, that is wrong in law; and the other reasons are the other cases which we have appealed against. When the court of appeal gives a decision, the person that pleads against that decision has a right to appeal to a further court; in this case the Supreme Court,” said Mr. Daudu.
Senator Saraki will again appear for trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal on Thursday, November 5.
Asked whether Mr. Saraki’s legal team will make an appearance Thursday, Mr. Daudu said “Let us wait till on the 5th then see what happens. I think it’s too early to start commenting on that.”
COURT OF APPEAL RULING
Mr. Saraki had asked the court of appeal to determine whether or not the tribunal was right in issuing a bench warrant against him.
He also asked the court to explain if any other person, other than the Attorney General of the Federation, could file criminal charges against him.
He questioned the composition of the tribunal with less than three members, as required by law.
Finally Saraki had asked the court of appeal to nullify the decisions of the CCT for allegedly violating the decision of the high court.
But the presiding Judge, justice Moore Adumein, on Wednesday, October 30 ruled that the appeal brought before it by Mr. Sraki lacked merit.
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment